What is PBL: Definition and History?
In a research article by Grant (2002), the origins and history of project-based learning are addressed. While project-based learning cannot be traced to one specific inventor or one specific time period, Grant sheds some light on the genesis of the theoretical foundations of project-based learning. As far back as 1900, people such as John Dewey have supported "learning by doing" and student-centered learning. These same ideas are also reflected in the concept of constructivism.
According to Grant (2002), constructivism was promoted by Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky in the 1960's and 1970's. Grant (2002) explains how, in constructivism, individuals construct knowledge through interactions with their environment, and each individual's knowledge construction is different. So, through conducting investigations, conversations or activities, an individual is learning by constructing new knowledge by building on their current knowledge.
A 2010 article by Stephanie Bell provides a 21st century view of project based learning. According to Bell, project based learning is a "student-driven, teacher facilitated approach to learning," carried-out through four major steps (Bell, 2010). First, students select projects or real-world problems based on their individual interests, as it is believed that natural curiosity can lead to productive learning. Next, students develop specific questions related to the project or problem they have selected, and with the aid of the teacher, the students carry-out their research and answer their own questions. Finally, students are required to present their projects to a selected audience (Bell, 2010).
Challenges and Benefits of PBL
According to Savery (2006) and Vernon and Blake (1993), there are many benefits of problem-based learning in today's educational system, but certain challenges and obstacles still remain in using PBL effectively. Regardless, the accessibility of information in today's world is perhaps pushing us toward new ways of student learning.
Benefits of PBL:
From Savery (2006):
- PBL offers a curriculum that is student-centered
- PBL can be an interdisciplinary endeavor
- PBL can be used over a long period of time for sustainable learning
- PBL has been proven in some studies to have equal effects of the traditional classroom approaches, but has also produced more engaged students who are better problem solvers
- PBL produces students who can think critically, are creative, collaborative, self analyzing, and self motivated
- PBL makes students responsible for their own learning and teaches them to work with others
- PBL was preferred by students who were surveyed about their opinions of a
particular course.
- Students felt PBL gave them a higher quality of education in their courses
- Students attitudes and opinions about PBL were much more positive than traditional methods.
- Medical students in the PBL courses performed better on their clinical exams.
Challenges of PBL:
From Savery (2006):
- Certain studies suggest there is no way to tell whether those trained in PBL were better suited for their particular field
- Questions remain whether or not the majority of students prefer this type of learning over traditional learning in the classroom.
- Despite this lack of evidence that PBL is more effective than traditional ways of learning, it is expanding into elementary, secondary and university education.
- The adoption of PBL by different levels of education has produced misconceptions and misunderstandings of what PBL actually is and how it should be used for educational purposes.
- Research shows that schools are adopting PBL without having the support of the staff
- Properly assessing student knowledge and content in PBL is difficult
- PBL forces the teacher to adapt from the knowledge distributor to the "facilitator of learning."
- It will take educational institutions time and further proof of success to fully commit to a PBL approach.
- PBL directly opposes a method of instruction that "teaches to the test," which makes using PBL in schools that are under pressure producing good test scores difficult.
- In one study, students in traditional teaching programs performed significantly better on their National Board Exams than those students in PBL programs. The board suggested there was a stronger correlation between student achievement and their school compared to the methodology used.
Since the 1970's, medical colleges have supported PBL to supplement traditional methods of teaching, such as lectures, with great success. Through surveys, Vernon and Blake (1993) found that medical students believed they received a high quality education through PBL and they also performed better in their clinical exams. While practical lab exams are not given at Mount St. Joseph High School, the PBL experience may be an important aspect of students' learning and may be linked to student success in laboratory experimentation in college. More and more colleges are implementing PBL courses which resemble group internships (Tappert & Stix, 2010). For the last 5 years, Pace University has had Information Technology (IT) teams of students work for real companies to solve their IT problems throughout their last semester of graduate school. These courses are having great success because of the numerous skills students leave college with. These include technical skills in their field of expertise, interpersonal and communication skills when working with managers and/or groups, creativity, organization, critical thinking, innovation, research skills and finally writing skills. Research has found that PBL has been effective in training institutes for instructors wanting to become tutors. Various undergraduate programs within the schools of Arts and Sciences, Business, Education, Nursing, Pharmacy, and Mathematics have incorporated PBL into their curriculum. It has also been found in MBA programs in Chemical Engineering, Economics, and Architecture (Savery, 2006).
Conclusion:
The literature reviews demonstrate that modern definitions of PLB vary. Based on our research there is evidence that PBL increases academic achievement, produces students who can think critically, are creative, collaborative, are motivated, and responsible learners. PBL is a trend in education that has the potential to influence student learning and achievement not only at Mount Saint Joseph High School, but with of students of all ages.
References:
Bell S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future. The Clearing House, Vol 82 (2). DOI: 10.1080/00098650903505415. Retrieved from: http://www.teacherscollegesj.org/resources/publications/PBL%20for%20the%2021%20Century.pdf
Grant, M. (2002). Getting a grip on project-based learning: Theory, cases and
recommendations. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, Vol. 5 (1). Retrieved from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2002/514/project-based.pdf
Savery, John R. (2006) "Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions," Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 3.
Tappert, C. C. & Stix, A. (2010). The trend toward online project-oriented capstone courses.
Computers in the Schools, 27(3), 200-220. Retrieved from http://csis.pace.edu/~ctappert/it691-10fall/projects-journal-2010.pdf
Vernon DT, Blake RL (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges [1993, 68(7):550-63]. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199307000-00015
PBL can refer to one of two things: PROJECT-based learning or PROBLEM-based learning. While completing my MAT at Loyola, PBL generally referred to PROBLEM-based learning.
ReplyDeleteMy understanding of our shift towards PBL at St. Joe is that, apart from being very in vogue, educationally-speaking, it is as a healthy alternative to busywork of homework assignments. But if we are devising projects, as Mr. Fitz seems to keep referring to PROJECT-based learning, then we are at risk for simply giving long-term busywork in place of homework.
The potential pitfalls of the project approach, as I just stated, lies in the ability for projects to just become another version of homework.
Possible benefits: Projects encourage independent research on the part of a student or group of students. In my "Drugs and Addiction" class in college, I learned a LOT about how various hallucinogens work because I had to be able to present that information to my classmates. My groupmates and I became experts on the topic.
I tend to get frustrated when I hear the term "project-based learning" because I think we should be adopting the "problem-based" approach, though I recognize that these approaches can be synthesized and are not necessarily mutually-exclusive.
The real problem/question at hand is "Why educate?" To what purpose or end? Unfortunately, not all students want to learn for learning's sake. So why bother with the others? We want to shape them into critical thinkers who seek to solve the world's problems (http://www.msjnet.edu/page.cfm?p=291). I think we should be pushing the boys to be solution-centered, critical thinkers.
During my ACTFL proficiency tests for Spanish, I had to create a solution to a variety of problems, all using Spanish (one example, I had arrived with family in Barcelona for vacation and the hotel had no record of my reservation - I had to work it out with the hotel). During American History at MSJ, Mr. Beck had a sheet with a variety of ways to increase federal revenue and/or jumpstart the economy during the Great Depression - we had to pick three that we thought would work best. The class discussion generated allowed us to see a bit more of the benefits and drawbacks of certain policies and gain insight into politics of that time. These two examples are problems that spur critical thought, solution-centered reasoning, and do not necessitate projects.
However, problem-based assignments can be made into projects. The Robotics class, for example, had to create a robot that could successfully cap the oil well in the Gulf of Mexico - both project and problem based.
If there were one way to wrap up my comment that has become much longer than originally anticipated, I would say that we should be favoring a problem-based approach to teaching, include projects where relevant, and be cautious as to whether a project approach to a certain topic will actually spur the level of critical thought and creativity we hope to instill in our students or simply become the busywork we set out to avoid.
Looking forward to the "methodology" post that aligns with the literature review.
ReplyDeleteThey are posted on the blog now, or you can see them on our wiki by searching MSJ in wikispaces on Learningfront!
Delete